ENOSIG Discussie (threads)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: scheme vraagje: is (accumulate cons nil sequence) zinvol? (was: Re: talks at meetings)
Lionel Elie Mamane writes:
> write (lambda (x) (accumulate cons nil x)) . This
> non-curryfication is IMHO one of the most irritating "features" of
> Lispy languages.
I'm not familiar with caml like languages, could you explain what it
is you find irritating?
Jan.
Follow-ups:
Gerelateerd:
- enosig meeting, 2004-01-09, 20:00, Joost's place, Joost van Baal <joostvb@xxxxxxx>, 2003/12/08
- report on last meeting (was: Re: enosig meeting, 2004-01-09, 20:00, Joost's place), Joost van Baal <joostvb@xxxxxxx>, 2004/01/10
- Re: report on last meeting, Jama Poulsen <jama@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 2004/01/12
- talks at meetings [was: report on last meeting], Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel@xxxxxxxxx>, 2004/01/12
- Re: talks at meetings [was: report on last meeting], Joost van Baal <joostvb@xxxxxxx>, 2004/01/15
- Re: talks at meetings, Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@xxxxxxx>, 2004/01/15
- scheme vraagje: is (accumulate cons nil sequence) zinvol? (was: Re: talks at meetings), Joost van Baal <joostvb@xxxxxxx>, 2004/09/09
- Re: scheme vraagje: is (accumulate cons nil sequence) zinvol? (was: Re: talks at meetings), Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel@xxxxxxxxx>, 2004/09/09
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]