Hi, On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 04:43:14PM +0200, Alex wrote: > Microsoft Germany has produced a new fud with informations about MS > versus Linux > Very funny. I began to miss it very much. > http://www.microsoft.com/germany/partner/strategie/open-source-abgrenzung Quote: Daneben unterliegen natürlich nicht alle Teile einer Distribution den gleichen Lizenzbedingungen und einige Unterroutinen können unter Umständen im kommerziellen Einsatz kostenpflichtig sein. Die meisten kommerziellen Lösungen für Linux sind alles andere als Open Source. This isn't wrong, only exaggerated, and picking only the arguments of one side (they don't say that there are distributions that are fully free, too). More accurate would be: Einige kommerziellen Lösungen für Linux sind alles andere als Open Source. If they want to show examples, all they have to do is show a SuSE box or a Caldera box. > The best is: They don't use their own format (doc), but pdf. This is actually a good thing, and nothing for them to be ashamed of: Open standards, readable by people not running their products, etc. > The document was written with Acrobat Destiller for Macintosh. > ****ROFL Now, that's more funny :-)
<<inline: application/pgp-signature>>